From a local blog [Inlandpolitics.com] I read the following:
"AGAIN we are hearing stories of how Bret Granlund, on behalf of District Attorney Mike Ramos, is illegally cajoling and providing legal advice WITHOUT A LICENSE.
This time to a defendant facing serious charges.
Ramos and Granlund conspired to prey on Postmus’s already debilitated mental state and drug-induced paranoia, and indirectly threatened him with years of State prison.
It’s an outrage that Ramos and Granlund suggested to this frightened man that should he seek his constitutional right to a fair trial, by a jury of his peers, he was doomed.
Ramos and Grunlund took advantage of Postmus’s serious mental disorder associated with his chronic drug abuse by discouraging him to proceed with his constitutional right to a jury trial.
His constitutional rights were violated.
They falsely, and illegally, led him to believe a jury would sentence him to years of State prison, as if it were fact. That was a lie.
Postmus had a constitutional right to be heard by a jury of his peers, have them hear all the evidence, how they obtained that evidence, who provided that so called evidence, or lack of evidence.
Ramos and Granlund INTERFERED with Postmus’s constitutional rights.
Ramos and Granlund IMPROPERLY induced Postmus to enter a plea.
Was Postmus EVEN represented by counsel when Granland relayed the DA’s message back and forth? Was he aware of the consequences? Was he clear headed or in a state of fear?"
Question? Any of it true?? The time limit on setting the plea aside is six (6) months me thinks.....Someone needs to have talked with a lawyer and needs to now if true....
No comments:
Post a Comment