COPIES of the ELECTION FRAUD COMPLAINTS & RELATED PROOF OF ELECTION FRAUD

evidence of election fraud in san bernardino county 2010.pdf (you can left click to open the link or can right click to save it--its a PDF of almost 4 megs--the attachments to the 2 complaints are the specific pages referred to in the letters and not the full report sent to the Board of Supervisors and Grand Jury); the most remarkable admission to date is Natasha Lindstrom's article in the June 18, 2010 Daily Press in which she states: "But more than 200,000 mail-in, provisional and damaged ballots that may have included residents within the 59th District remained uncounted after the primary election day" (an article on Donnelly's lead in the 59th Assembly District Republican primary). In the electronic version of the article Lindstrom on the 17th of June says "San Bernardino County finished counting mail-in ballots last week, but has 5,700 provisional ballots to count and 8,400 damaged ballots to verify or throw out, said Kathy Jackson, Registrar spokeswoman. San Bernardino County will release updated tallies at 8 p.m. today" (http://www.vvdailypress.com/news/county-19959-angeles-votes.html--which is it??). What makes the later story remarkable, is that with approximately 159,000 (approximate) votes tallied (counted) by the time the registrar (through its software) and the Daily Press declared the "winner" at 10:32 pm, there should be potentially another 200,000 votes ---hmm, wonder where they are.

Meanwhile the Registrar only reports as of Last Updated: June 18, 2010 11:36 AM

Registration & Turnout

801,272 Voters

	Vote Count	Percent
Vote By Mail Turnout	119,544	14.92%
Precinct Turnout	92,924	11.60%
Total	212,468	26.52%

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

1406/1406 100.00%

	Vote Count	Percent
MICHAEL A. RAMOS	96,885	54.16%
FRANK H. GUZMAN	34,240	19.14%
BOB CONAWAY	47,755	26.70%
Total	178,880	100.00%

33,588 votes missing on what the Registrar reports (between total votes cast and votes counted in the DA race) and 182,000 between the uncounted ballots and what was reported (based on the news stories)--an awful lot of invalidated damaged ballots and provisionals!

P.S. Anyone note, the vote percentage as of 10:32 pm for Ramos was 54.9% with 66,767 of the vote counted on June 8, 2010 and with 178,880 of the vote counted through 6/18/10, the percentage for Ramos was 54.16% or again less than a percentage point difference after counting over 112,000 more votes (which by the way is a little over half of the 200,000 uncounted ballots mail-in, provisional and damaged ballots that were not counted on election day win the software and the local media declared the "winner"); the only changes in the June 18, 2010 report being between the two challengers (how convenient)--the software it seems maintained the margin of victory. One wonders if the 88,000 ballots that were apparently NOT counted or disregarded, were cast for Guzman or Conaway--if so, it would be a clever way maintain Ramos' percentage and margin (and who do you think controls that?? the politically appointed registrar and her loyal minions!!)